Przejdź do głównej treści

Widok zawartości stron Widok zawartości stron

Pomiń baner

Widok zawartości stron Widok zawartości stron

Logo INCET

Widok zawartości stron Widok zawartości stron

BIOUNCERTAINTY - ERC Starting Grant no. 805498

ERC logo

Widok zawartości stron Widok zawartości stron

Znajdziesz nas tutaj:

Widok zawartości stron Widok zawartości stron

24 października 2022 roku - Saul Smilansky - Suicide, Organ Donation and Meaning in Life: Some Disturbing Reflections

24 października 2022 roku - Saul Smilansky - <span lang='en'>Suicide, Organ Donation and Meaning in Life: Some Disturbing Reflections</span>

Interdyscyplinarne Centrum Etyki UJ (INCET) zaprasza na kolejne otwarte seminarium badawcze! Referat zatytułowany "Suicide, Organ Donation and Meaning in Life: Some Disturbing Reflections" wygłosi Saul Smilansky. Tym razem spotkanie odbędzie się w poniedziałek 24 października o godzinie 16:00 w sali 25 przy ul. Grodzkiej 52 oraz za pośrednictwem platformy MS Teams.

Abstrakt

Our discussion begins with certain facts: (a) Every year, hundreds of thousands of people intentionally kill themselves (and social efforts to prevent suicides are fairly feeble); (b) For such people, the act of killing themselves usually confers no positive objective meaning on their lives, and subjectively they often kill themselves with a sense that life, or at least their life, has no positive meaning; (c) Every year, hundreds of thousands of people die, for want of properly functioning organs, and had a liver, or a lung, or a kidney, for example, been donated to them on time, they could have been saved. Millions suffer before dying and could be similarly helped. I present, first, a "Modest plan" (MP) for publically connecting organ donation with meaning in life. This would involve donating e.g. a kidney when alive. Second, an "Ambitious plan" (AP) which focuses on potential suicides. I explore whether these plans ought to be applied, and consider the dangers. I ask whether we might speak about a moral duty, if one kills oneself, to do so in a way that will permit use of one’s organs; and claim that it is plausible. I then look at what our likely resistance to these proposals indicates. At the end, I briefly explore some further bold possible implications of the discussion, for current organ allocation and particularly with respect to the opportunities and dangers opened by future technology. The lessons of this exploration seem surprising and radical.

O autorze:

Saul Smilansky (D.Phil., Oxford) is a Professor at the Department of Philosophy, University of Haifa, Israel. He works primarily on normative and applied ethics, the free will problem, and meaning in life. Currently he is working on the idea of "Crazy Ethics", a view of morality where frequently matters seem to be true (or at least plausible) yet are also absurd. He is the author of Free Will and Illusion (Oxford University Press 2000), 10 Moral Paradoxes (Blackwell 2007), and over one hundred papers in philosophical journals and edited collections. 
  

Link do spotkania w MS Teams