Skip to main content

Web Content Display Web Content Display

Skip banner

Web Content Display Web Content Display

INCET logo

Web Content Display Web Content Display

BIOUNCERTAINTY - ERC Starting Grant no. 805498

ERC logo

Web Content Display Web Content Display

Web Content Display Web Content Display

New paper by Piotr Bystranowski, Vilius Dranseika & Tomasz Żuradzki

New paper by Piotr Bystranowski, Vilius Dranseika & Tomasz Żuradzki

Piotr Bystranowski, Vilius Dranseika & Tomasz Żuradzki from BIOUNCERTAINTY project, published a new article: "The Disconnection That Wasn’t: Philosophy in Modern Bioethics from a Quantitative Perspective" in American Journal of Bioethics

Abstract

Blumenthal-Barby et al. (2022) situate their discussion of philosophy and bioethics in the context of (report- edly) widely held assumption that, when compared to the early days of bioethics, the role of philosophy is now diminished across the field—the assumption we call the Disconnection Thesis. This assumption can be summarized, to use authors’ own words, by the phrase “philosophy’s glory days in bioethics are over.” While in no place of the article did they explicitly endorse the Disconnection Thesis, at least some of the authors had previously endorsed it in print (Savulescu 2015).
Such expressions of collective expert wisdom might be a valuable source of information on the discipline’s history, but they should not be accepted uncritically. Given the explosion in the size and scope of bioethical research in recent decades, any scholar’s familiarity with the area is necessarily based on selective reading and might be biased. Hence, in this commentary, we examine what kind of more rigorous evidence could corroborate the Disconnection Thesis. In other words, if the role of philosophy in bioethics has been indeed diminishing, what kind of observable patterns should we expect to see?

Link to the article

Bystranowski, P., Dranseika, V., & Żuradzki, T. (2022). The Disconnection That Wasn’t: Philosophy in Modern Bioethics from a Quantitative Perspective. The American Journal of Bioethics, 22(12), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2134490 [preprint]
Recommended
Regret Averse Opinion Aggregation - a new publication by Lee Elkin
Regret Averse Opinion Aggregation - a new publication by Lee Elkin
Is meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the efficacy of interventions a reliable source of evidence for therapeutic decisions? - a new article by Mariusz Maziarz
Is meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the efficacy of interventions a reliable source of evidence for therapeutic decisions? - a new article by Mariusz Maziarz
Experimental Philosophical Bioethics and  Normative Inference - a new article co-authored by Vilius Dranseika
Experimental Philosophical Bioethics and Normative Inference - a new article co-authored by Vilius Dranseika
New paper co-authored by Tomasz Żuradzki
New paper co-authored by Tomasz Żuradzki