Przejdź do głównej treści

Widok zawartości stron Widok zawartości stron

Pomiń baner

Widok zawartości stron Widok zawartości stron

Logo INCET

Widok zawartości stron Widok zawartości stron

BIOUNCERTAINTY - ERC Starting Grant no. 805498

ERC logo

Widok zawartości stron Widok zawartości stron

Znajdziesz nas tutaj:

Widok zawartości stron Widok zawartości stron

10 stycznia 2024 – Maximilian Theisen – The Exculpatory Potential of Moral Ignorance: Evidence From a Blame-Updating Paradigm

10 stycznia 2024 – Maximilian Theisen – The Exculpatory Potential of Moral Ignorance: Evidence From a Blame-Updating Paradigm

Interdyscyplinarne Centrum Etyki UJ (INCET) zaprasza na kolejne otwarte seminarium badawcze! Referat zatytułowany "The Exculpatory Potential of Moral Ignorance: Evidence From a Blame-Updating Paradigm" wygłosi Maximilian Theisen. Spotkanie odbędzie się wyjątkowo w środę 10 stycznia o godzinie 17:30 w sali 25 przy ul. Grodzkiej 52 oraz za pośrednictwem platformy MS Teams.

Abstrakt

In this talk, Maximilian Theisen (Heidelberg University, Germany) will present joint work from a collaboration with James Andow (Manchester University, UK) on the exculpatory potential of moral ignorance. Over the past few decades, philosophers have started to scrutinize the epistemic conditions on moral responsibility. One central focus of this debate is whether ignorance of moral norms can excuse wrongdoing in the same way as ignorance of the factual circumstances of an action can excuse wrongdoing. Volitionists link the exculpatory potential of moral ignorance to the fulfillment of the agent’s procedural obligations. Quality of Will theorists have suggested the further conditions of the inaccessibility of the moral truth and high moral difficulty. In a pre-registered experiment (N = 251), Theisen and Andow tested whether these three conditions reduce ascriptions of blame for everyday moral transgressions (act blameworthiness) and for moral ignorance about their wrongness (belief blameworthiness). Their findings suggest that moral ignorance might in principle be perceived as exculpatory, but that its exculpatory potential depends on specific conditions that are rarely met in reality. The implications of these findings for debates on epistemic conditions on moral responsibility and on the normative relevance of moral epistemic states will be discussed.

 

Link do spotkania na MS Teams